Public opinion formation is an intricate and evolving process shaped by the dynamic interplay of socio-political forces, economic realities, and media-driven narratives. In Kerala, a state widely recognized for its progressive policies and deep-rooted leftist traditions, the process of opinion shaping assumes unique significance due to the historical dominance of the Communist Party of India (Marxist) (CPI(M)) in its governance. Over decades, the left government has spearheaded numerous transformative initiatives, including advancements in public healthcare, universal education, gender equity, and comprehensive welfare programs, positioning Kerala as a model of social development. However, these achievements are increasingly being obscured by a systematic and sustained anti-left propaganda campaign driven by segments of the public media. Through strategic distortion of facts, selective amplification of controversies, and a relentless focus on isolated administrative setbacks, these narratives work to erode the credibility of the CPI(M) and its leadership, particularly Chief Minister Pinarayi Vijayan. Beyond undermining public trust, such propaganda efforts deliberately veil the broader developmental success story that has brought Kerala both national and international acclaim. Utilizing the framework of Quantum Dialectical Analysis, which examines the interaction of cohesive and decoherent forces in shaping public consciousness, this article explores how anti-left propaganda fragments cohesive narratives of progress and equity. By keeping the public in darkness about Kerala’s tangible growth under leftist governance, these campaigns aim to realign perceptions to favor neoliberal and right-wing ideologies, thereby attempting to reshape the socio-political fabric of the state.
Quantum dialectics, which integrates principles of quantum mechanics with dialectical materialism, offers a powerful framework for understanding the complex and dynamic process of public opinion formation. Public opinion, much like a quantum system, exists in a state of superposition—an indeterminate mix of diverse viewpoints—until external forces act upon it to collapse this multiplicity into a dominant narrative. In the context of Kerala’s socio-political landscape, efforts to unify public opinion often revolve around presenting cohesive narratives that emphasize factual achievements in growth, equity, and development under leftist governance. These cohesive forces aim to create a shared understanding of the state’s progress, grounded in tangible successes such as advancements in healthcare, education, gender equity, and welfare. However, propaganda functions as a decoherent force, deliberately disrupting these unified narratives by distorting facts, amplifying controversies, and promoting divisive viewpoints. This systematic disruption fragments public opinion, replacing informed consensus with misinformed and polarized perspectives. The interaction of cohesive and decoherent forces inevitably generates contradictions—tensions between the lived realities of development and the distorted images propagated through media. These contradictions not only shape the emergent dynamics of public opinion but also highlight the inherent struggle between fact-based narratives and those designed to mislead and manipulate. Quantum dialectics, therefore, provides a lens through which to examine how these forces clash and evolve, ultimately influencing the socio-political consciousness of a society.
A significant and troubling aspect of media propaganda in Kerala is its deliberate silence on the anti-Kerala policies of the central BJP government, which have had a profound impact on the state’s development, autonomy, and governance. Despite Kerala’s consistent ranking as one of India’s most progressive states in terms of human development, public health, and education, mainstream media downplays or outright ignores critical issues such as the central government’s drastic reduction in the state’s share of central taxes and delays in granting approval for crucial infrastructure projects like the K-Rail and other developmental initiatives. These delays not only stall economic progress but also obstruct Kerala’s ability to leverage its resources effectively. Additionally, the BJP government’s discriminatory allocation of disaster relief funds, even during catastrophic events like the devastating floods of 2018 and 2019, highlights a clear disregard for equitable governance despite Kerala’s globally acclaimed crisis management efforts during such emergencies. Another critical area of neglect is the erosion of cooperative federalism, where the central government consistently undermines state rights in sectors like education, healthcare, and agriculture, imposing policies that favor centralization and neoliberal priorities over local needs. Rather than scrutinizing these systemic issues and holding the central government accountable, media narratives disproportionately focus on Kerala-specific controversies, amplifying isolated incidents or alleged scandals involving the state government or CPI(M) leadership. This selective framing distracts public attention from the broader structural challenges imposed by the BJP-led central government. Such biased media coverage not only absolves the center of its failures but also weakens Kerala’s ability to resist and counter policies that undermine its developmental aspirations and federal autonomy, posing significant risks to the state’s socio-economic fabric.
In Kerala, anti-left propaganda has employed a range of decoherent strategies aimed at obscuring the substantial achievements of the CPI(M)-led government under the leadership of Pinarayi Vijayan. The state, known for its progressive governance, has made remarkable strides in public welfare, healthcare, education, gender equity, and social justice. Kerala’s success in managing crises, such as the Nipah virus outbreaks and the COVID-19 pandemic, as well as its focus on initiatives like the Life Mission housing scheme and Kudumbashree self-help groups, have garnered national and international recognition. However, these accomplishments are systematically downplayed or distorted by segments of mainstream and digital media. Propaganda efforts often highlight isolated administrative lapses, exaggerated controversies, or alleged instances of corruption, such as the gold smuggling case, to discredit the government and shift focus away from its broader developmental achievements. Media outlets amplify dissent by framing infrastructure projects like K-Rail as anti-people or ecologically harmful while ignoring the long-term benefits these projects promise. Additionally, the narrative of fiscal mismanagement is pushed by focusing on Kerala’s debt levels without considering the context of the state’s robust welfare spending and its significant impact on quality of life indicators. The propaganda also selectively uses identity politics to polarize public opinion, accusing the left of appeasement or favoritism toward specific communities while ignoring the secular and inclusive nature of its governance. By employing such strategies, anti-left propaganda aims to create a fragmented and misinformed public perception, eroding trust in the CPI(M) and Pinarayi Vijayan’s leadership while simultaneously paving the way for neoliberal and right-wing narratives to gain traction in the state.
Media outlets in Kerala have increasingly adopted a strategy of disproportionately highlighting isolated failures or alleged controversies, effectively diverting attention from the systemic successes of the state’s governance under the CPI(M)-led administration. For instance, delays in infrastructure projects such as the K-Rail SilverLine project are sensationalized, with narratives framing the initiative as anti-people, economically unviable, or environmentally damaging, while failing to contextualize its long-term potential to revolutionize transportation and boost economic growth. Similarly, instances like the gold smuggling case are often presented as emblematic of systemic corruption within the government, despite a lack of substantive evidence directly implicating key state leaders. This selective focus on negative events consciously obscures Kerala’s remarkable achievements, such as its consistently high Human Development Index (HDI), which reflects its exemplary performance in education, health, and social equity. Furthermore, Kerala’s globally recognized public health model, which effectively managed crises like the COVID-19 pandemic and Nipah virus outbreaks, is either downplayed or overlooked. These successes, rooted in years of investment in a robust public health infrastructure and decentralized governance, are rarely given the prominence they deserve. Instead, the media perpetuates a narrative that emphasizes shortcomings and controversies, creating a skewed perception that undermines public trust in the government. This biased framing not only diminishes the credibility of the state’s developmental policies but also serves to obscure the broader story of Kerala’s progressive governance and its ability to consistently outperform other states on key socio-economic indicators.
Public welfare schemes initiated by the CPI(M)-led government in Kerala, such as the Life Mission housing project and universal health coverage, have been transformative in reducing inequality and improving the quality of life for marginalized communities. These programs are designed to address the fundamental needs of the underprivileged by providing affordable housing, accessible healthcare, and social security, which have garnered widespread recognition for their effectiveness and inclusivity. However, segments of the media systematically reframe these initiatives as examples of unsustainable populism, ignoring their long-term socio-economic benefits. For instance, the Life Mission project, which aims to provide secure housing for the homeless and economically disadvantaged, is often criticized for being fiscally burdensome or poorly executed, despite the visible improvement it has brought to thousands of lives. Similarly, Kerala’s universal health coverage, which has been pivotal in achieving some of the best health indicators in India, including low infant mortality and high life expectancy, is rarely celebrated in media narratives. Instead, the focus shifts to alleged inefficiencies or isolated shortcomings, undermining the larger success of these programs. By framing these welfare measures as populist or impractical, media narratives not only distort public perception but also divert attention from their role in fostering equity and social justice. This selective reporting serves to downplay the progressive governance model that prioritizes human development over neoliberal profit-oriented policies, keeping the public uninformed about the tangible and transformative impacts of these initiatives.
Kerala’s strong economic performance, characterized by high literacy rates, significant social mobility, and a remittance-driven GDP that supports one of India’s most equitable societies, is often overlooked in mainstream media narratives. These indicators, which reflect decades of progressive governance and investment in human capital, rarely receive the attention they deserve. Instead, media outlets disproportionately focus on Kerala’s fiscal deficits, framing the state as economically unsustainable under leftist governance. This narrative fails to contextualize Kerala’s welfare-oriented spending, which has consistently delivered high returns in terms of human development, reduced poverty, and improved quality of life. Programs like the Kudumbashree initiative, which has empowered women through micro-enterprises and self-help groups, and the state’s concerted efforts to uplift marginalized communities through education, healthcare, and housing, are similarly downplayed. These transformative measures, which promote gender equality and social justice, are seldom highlighted in media coverage. Instead, identity-based issues are amplified to polarize voters, deliberately shifting public attention away from class-based equity and the systemic benefits of leftist policies. By focusing on divisive narratives rather than Kerala’s achievements, the media undermines the state’s developmental success and erodes public understanding of the long-term value of its progressive model of governance. This selective framing not only distorts economic realities but also feeds into a broader effort to delegitimize leftist governance, despite its proven track record of fostering inclusive growth and equity.
Pinarayi Vijayan’s leadership style, often characterized by a pragmatic and centralized approach to decision-making, has been instrumental in driving Kerala’s developmental success. However, media narratives frequently frame this style as authoritarian, overshadowing the participatory governance model that has long been a cornerstone of the CPI(M)’s political philosophy. Under his leadership, initiatives like Kerala’s efficient pandemic response, large-scale welfare schemes, and forward-thinking infrastructure projects have been executed with precision, often requiring decisive action to overcome bureaucratic delays and political obstacles. Yet, this decisiveness is reframed by segments of the media as an autocratic consolidation of power, ignoring the collaborative processes and consultations involved in state-level policymaking. Furthermore, the media amplifies internal party disagreements, portraying CPI(M) as a fractured and dysfunctional entity. Routine ideological debates and discussions, which are integral to the democratic functioning of the party, are misrepresented as signs of internal collapse or rebellion. This selective framing not only distorts the party’s cohesive ideological foundation but also seeks to undermine public confidence in its ability to govern effectively. By focusing on these exaggerated narratives of authoritarianism and discord, the media diverts attention from Kerala’s tangible achievements under Vijayan’s leadership, diluting the significance of a governance model that continues to prioritize equity, welfare, and grassroots empowerment. This framing serves a broader propaganda agenda aimed at destabilizing public trust in the CPI(M) while creating space for neoliberal and right-wing ideologies to gain traction in the state.
Propaganda in Kerala often exploits cultural and religious narratives to create divisions and erode the public’s trust in the left’s secular and inclusive governance model. A frequent tactic is to accuse the CPI(M)-led government of favoring minority communities—particularly Muslims and Christians—while neglecting the sentiments and needs of the Hindu majority. These narratives deliberately misrepresent the state’s policies, framing welfare initiatives, reservation policies, or community-focused schemes as instances of appeasement rather than equity-driven governance. For instance, targeted propaganda amplifies instances like the government’s financial support for minority educational institutions or aid during religious festivals, portraying them as preferential treatment, while ignoring similar measures extended to Hindu institutions and communities. By doing so, these narratives undermine the core principles of secularism and inclusivity that define Kerala’s governance model, fostering suspicion and resentment among the majority population. This strategy also seeks to shift focus from the left’s class-based approach, which emphasizes collective welfare over identity politics. The framing of the left as being “anti-majority” is particularly harmful in a state known for its communal harmony, as it sows seeds of polarization and division. Moreover, such propaganda serves a larger agenda of destabilizing the left’s ideological commitment to secular governance, paving the way for right-wing forces to promote their own majoritarian agenda. By exploiting these cultural and religious fault lines, anti-left propaganda not only distorts public perception but also threatens to disrupt Kerala’s long-standing tradition of coexistence and social equity.
Kerala’s public consciousness is shaped by a dynamic interplay of diverse ideological influences, reflecting the state’s unique socio-political landscape. On one side, there is a strong leftist commitment to welfare-oriented governance, emphasizing equity, social justice, and public investment in essential services like healthcare, education, and housing. On the other, neoliberal aspirations for privatization and market-driven growth, fueled by global trends and corporate interests, coexist within the same social framework. This ideological superposition represents a complex and fluid state of public opinion, capable of leaning toward either vision depending on external influences. Anti-left media campaigns act as “quantum observers,” collapsing this ideological superposition into a predominantly anti-left narrative through a calculated strategy of selective framing. These campaigns focus disproportionately on highlighting perceived failures of leftist governance—such as delays in infrastructure projects, isolated administrative lapses, or exaggerated corruption allegations—while deliberately ignoring systemic successes like Kerala’s high human development indicators, robust public healthcare system, and inclusive welfare schemes. Crises are often manufactured or amplified to create an illusion of inefficiency and instability, steering public opinion away from the left’s achievements. By manipulating this superposition, the media not only distorts the ideological balance but also reinforces neoliberal and right-wing ideologies as viable alternatives, undermining the foundational principles of Kerala’s progressive governance. This deliberate framing ultimately fragments public consciousness, eroding trust in the left’s developmental model while paving the way for privatization and market-driven policies that prioritize profits over people.
While propaganda campaigns aim to obscure the achievements of Kerala’s leftist governance, contradictions within these narratives often reveal media biases and lead to public disillusionment. One striking example is Kerala’s globally acclaimed response to the COVID-19 pandemic, which, despite the media’s attempts to downplay its success, became a clear demonstration of the state’s robust public healthcare system and effective crisis management. The decentralized governance model, combined with strong grassroots interventions, not only minimized fatalities but also showcased the importance of proactive public health measures. This success reinforced public trust in the CPI(M)-led government, highlighting the effectiveness of its welfare-oriented policies in times of crisis. Similarly, the media’s labeling of welfare measures as unsustainable is starkly contradicted by Kerala’s consistently superior quality-of-life indicators, including high literacy rates, low infant mortality, and equitable access to healthcare and education. These achievements underscore the long-term value of the state’s inclusive development model, even as neoliberal and right-wing propaganda attempts to portray it as fiscally irresponsible.
Nevertheless, the narrative of inefficiency and anti-development has managed to influence segments of the middle class, who are increasingly swayed by neoliberal alternatives that promise rapid privatization and economic growth. This demographic, often aspirational and influenced by global trends, views the CPI(M) as outdated and resistant to modernization. Social media platforms, dominated by youth and urban voters, have become key battlegrounds for anti-left campaigns, where curated content and targeted advertisements amplify narratives of irrelevance and stagnation associated with leftist governance. However, these efforts to delegitimize the left often fail to resonate with marginalized communities, who directly benefit from the CPI(M)’s grassroots programs like Kudumbashree and subsidized housing initiatives. These programs continue to serve as a bulwark against divisive narratives, reaffirming the left’s commitment to equity and social justice. Thus, while propaganda creates pockets of doubt and dissent, its contradictions also expose inherent biases, allowing the left to reassert its relevance through tangible achievements and resilient grassroots support.
In rural Kerala, where the CPI(M)-led government’s welfare programs have delivered tangible benefits, media propaganda often struggles to gain traction. Initiatives such as subsidized housing through Life Mission, access to quality healthcare, and empowerment programs like Kudumbashree have visibly improved the lives of marginalized communities, fostering a strong base of support for leftist governance. However, sustained anti-left campaigns increasingly target this base by emphasizing cultural and identity conflicts. Propaganda seeks to shift public focus from class-based solidarity to divisive narratives, accusing the left of favoring minorities or neglecting the sentiments of the Hindu majority. By exploiting religious and caste-based identities, these narratives aim to fragment rural support and erode trust in the government’s inclusive and secular policies.
Despite these sustained efforts, the left has significant opportunities to counter these strategies by addressing the contradictions within media narratives and reinforcing its developmental achievements. Direct communication with the public—through grassroots campaigns, open forums, and localized outreach—can bypass the biases of mainstream media and highlight improvements in healthcare, education, and infrastructure that directly impact daily life. The left can also leverage social media platforms to proactively counter misinformation, promote success stories, and build alternative narratives that resonate with younger and tech-savvy audiences. Additionally, a renewed focus on participatory governance, which involves communities in decision-making and development processes, can help rebuild trust and demonstrate the inclusivity of leftist governance. Strengthening programs that empower women, farmers, and laborers can further consolidate support, while highlighting these successes in real terms undermines divisive propaganda. By staying rooted in its core values of equity, social justice, and participatory development, the left can effectively neutralize identity-based narratives and reaffirm its relevance in rural Kerala.
The media’s anti-left propaganda in Kerala represents a calculated effort to distort public perception by obscuring the state’s remarkable growth and development under CPI(M) rule. This propaganda relies on decoherent strategies that amplify controversies, manufacture crises, and selectively frame isolated incidents to suppress the larger narrative of systemic successes. By using these tactics, the media seeks to fragment public opinion, undermine trust in leftist governance, and create space for neoliberal and right-wing ideologies. However, a Quantum Dialectical Analysis reveals that these strategies are not without contradictions. The deliberate focus on failures often exposes media biases, fostering public disillusionment and a growing awareness of the discrepancies between the lived realities of Kerala’s developmental progress and the distorted narratives being propagated. These contradictions present opportunities for the left to reinvigorate its public support by directly addressing misinformation, emphasizing tangible achievements in healthcare, education, and social equity, and reinforcing its commitment to participatory governance. As Kerala’s socio-political landscape evolves, the left’s ability to adapt, counter propaganda effectively, and assert its developmental vision will play a decisive role in shaping the state’s future. By staying true to its principles of equity, inclusivity, and grassroots empowerment, the CPI(M) can not only sustain its relevance but also reaffirm its position as a beacon of progressive governance in India.
QUANTUM DIALECTICS - BLOG ARTICLES 
Leave a comment