Organic farming is commonly perceived in popular discourse as a simple method of agriculture that avoids the use of synthetic chemicals, genetically modified organisms, and artificial growth regulators. While this technical definition captures an aspect of the practice, it fails to grasp its deeper ontological and systemic significance. When reinterpreted through the lens of Quantum Dialectics, organic farming emerges not merely as an alternative technique, but as a revolutionary form of praxis—a conscious, structured intervention in the dialectical unfolding of life. It represents a profound attempt to reintegrate agriculture into the dynamic matrix of material, ecological, and cosmic becoming, restoring the ruptured relations between human labor, biological processes, and planetary systems.
From this standpoint, organic farming is not a retreat into tradition or a romantic idealization of pre-industrial methods, but rather a dialectical negation of industrial agriculture and a sublation of both traditional and modern scientific knowledge. The industrial agricultural system, driven by capitalist accumulation, mechanistic reductionism, and techno-fix ideology, has become a paradigmatic expression of decohesive forces—fragmenting ecosystems, commodifying life, eroding soil vitality, and alienating farmers from the land. This system breaks the dialectical unity of organism and environment, of nutrient and cycle, of seed and season. It treats life not as a process of unfolding contradictions but as a machine to be manipulated and optimized.
Organic farming, in contrast, attempts to heal this fragmentation by cultivating layered coherence across multiple quantum levels of organization. At the molecular level, it reestablishes biochemical harmony through composting, microbial synergy, and the recycling of nutrients. At the biological level, it fosters biodiversity, polyculture, and ecological feedback mechanisms that allow life to self-regulate and evolve. At the ecological level, it restores the dialectical metabolism between land, water, atmosphere, and organisms, recognizing the farm not as an isolated unit but as a nodal point in the larger field of planetary life. At the social level, it re-embeds farming in communal, ethical, and democratic practices that empower farmers, nourish communities, and resist corporate domination.
Thus, organic farming becomes a concrete expression of the dialectical movement from alienation to coherence, from entropy to regeneration, from mechanistic separation to systemic totality. It is not a fixed method but a living synthesis, continuously adapting through reflective engagement with nature’s contradictions. In this way, organic farming—understood through Quantum Dialectics—stands as both a scientific paradigm and a political project: a microcosmic arena where the struggle for planetary coherence, ecological justice, and ontological renewal unfolds.
The rise of industrial agriculture in the 20th century marked a profound shift in humanity’s relationship with the earth. It was not merely a technical evolution but a historical manifestation of decohesive forces—an aggressive application of mechanization, chemical interventions, monocultural logic, and genetic control that systematically dismantled the layered coherence that had sustained agro-ecological systems for millennia. What had once been a dialectical and reciprocal relationship between soil, seed, season, and human labor was replaced by a linear, extractivist paradigm driven by profit and production. Mechanization reduced the farm to a factory floor; monoculture simplified complex ecosystems into fragile uniformities; synthetic fertilizers and pesticides bypassed biological regulation in favor of short-term yield; and genetic manipulation redefined life itself as a programmable code to be owned, patented, and commodified.
In this transformation, fertile soil—once a living quantum matrix teeming with microbial life and biogeochemical intelligence—was chemically sterilized and rendered inert, a passive substrate for synthetic nutrients. Seeds, once the shared cultural and biological heritage of communities, were transformed into corporate property, embedded with terminator genes and licensed through intellectual property laws. The farmer, who historically embodied a form of ecological subjectivity rooted in intimate knowledge of local conditions, was dispossessed of this role and reduced to a wage-laborer or a debt-burdened input manager, subservient to global supply chains and transnational agribusiness.
From the standpoint of Quantum Dialectics, this is not merely a regression in technique or a wrong turn in policy—it is the outward symptom of a deep systemic contradiction. It represents a rupture in the dialectical coherence that must exist between human praxis, natural rhythms, and the quantum-field of life. Industrial agriculture externalizes and represses contradiction rather than internalizing and transforming it. It attempts to eliminate variability, unpredictability, and emergence—the very qualities that make life resilient and creative—by replacing them with control, standardization, and domination. This violates the universal principle of dialectical development: that coherence arises not from suppression of contradiction, but from its structured unfolding and resolution.
In this light, organic farming is not to be seen as a nostalgic return to a premodern past, nor simply as a set of best practices devoid of systemic critique. Rather, it must be understood as a negation of the negation—a dialectical sublation (Aufhebung) of both traditional agro-ecological wisdom and modern scientific insight, synthesized into a higher-order coherence. It integrates the experiential knowledge of indigenous and peasant traditions—rooted in seasonal cycles, ecological diversity, and local autonomy—with the analytical tools of soil biology, systems ecology, and quantum field understanding. It is a scientifically grounded and historically conscious mode of production that seeks not to revert, but to transcend—to reclaim the dialectical unity between the material base of agriculture and the emergent totality of planetary life.
Thus, organic farming—recast through Quantum Dialectics—does not merely oppose industrial agriculture; it reconstitutes the field of agriculture itself as a site of praxis, contradiction, and emergence. It re-establishes the farm not as a production unit, but as a living, dialectically structured field, where soil, water, plants, animals, microbes, climate, labor, and consciousness interact as quantum layers in a continuously evolving totality. This is the philosophical, scientific, and political horizon toward which truly revolutionary organic agriculture must aspire.
Organic farming, when understood through the framework of Quantum Dialectics, is not a single-layered activity but a multi-dimensional process that operates across a hierarchy of quantum layers. Each of these layers—from molecular to ethical—is structured by the dynamic tension between cohesive and decohesive forces, which shape the unfolding of life and matter. Organic agriculture, in its deepest sense, is a praxis of restoring dialectical coherence across these layers, enabling the farm to function not as an isolated unit but as an integrated part of the evolving planetary totality.
At the molecular layer, organic farming consciously avoids the use of synthetic fertilizers, pesticides, and herbicides, which function as decohesive agents that disrupt the molecular harmony of the soil. These chemicals destabilize microbial communities, interfere with nutrient cycling, and sever the intricate biochemical dialogues between plants and their surrounding micro-ecology. In contrast, organic practices foster molecular resonance through methods such as composting, use of biofertilizers, green manures, and mineral amendments that nourish the soil holistically. These practices support the dialectical interplay of elements, microbes, and enzymes, maintaining chemical coherence that undergirds all higher layers of life.
At the biological layer, organic farming facilitates the dialectic of growth and regulation through strategies like crop rotation, intercropping, companion planting, and integrated pest management. These methods encourage biodiversity not as an aesthetic or conservationist goal, but as a structural necessity for systemic resilience. Biological diversity introduces functional redundancy, feedback loops, and self-regulatory mechanisms that prevent the collapse of ecosystems under stress. Here, diversity is not randomness—it is a dialectical expression of coherence, allowing the living system to metabolize contradiction through adaptation and regeneration.
The ecological layer encompasses broader interrelations between land, water, climate, and biotic communities. Organic agriculture at this level is concerned with landscape-level equilibrium, integrating elements such as watershed management, pollinator habitats, animal integration, and agroforestry into a resonant whole. The farm is no longer seen as a bounded economic unit but as a semi-permeable field interacting with larger ecosystems. This marks a decisive shift from anthropocentric control to a planetary co-evolutionary ethic, where humans cease to dominate and instead participate in the dialectical becoming of nature. The farm becomes a living organism, a node in the greater metabolic process of the Earth itself.
At the social layer, organic farming reconnects agriculture with human dignity, autonomy, and community life. It revives local control over land, seeds, and labor, pushing back against the alienation imposed by global agribusiness, monoculture economies, and corporate supply chains. Models such as community-supported agriculture (CSA), cooperative farming, and agroecological movements aim to restore economic coherence through fair trade, ethical production, and collective ownership. The farmer is no longer a marginal actor in a profit-driven food chain but a central participant in the dialectical unfolding of sustainable, equitable food systems.
Finally, at the cognitive-ethical layer, organic farming reorients human consciousness itself. It challenges the extractivist logic that sees nature as dead resource, replacing it with a mode of participatory stewardship rooted in care, humility, and awareness of totality. Farming becomes an act of ethical subjectivity, a form of ontological engagement in which the farmer is not a mere technician applying external inputs but a dialectical mediator—someone who tunes into the subtle rhythms of the Earth, internalizes contradiction, and acts creatively to restore coherence. This ethical layer is not supplemental but foundational, shaping how all other layers are approached and integrated.
In this quantum-dialectical perspective, organic farming reveals itself as a layered coherence project, striving to harmonize the multiplicity of forces—chemical, biological, ecological, social, and ethical—that converge in the act of cultivating life. It is a paradigm of wholeness emerging through contradiction, guided not by domination, but by dialectical participation in the evolutionary unfolding of the Earth.
In the framework of Quantum Dialectics, all systems evolve not by linear accumulation or mechanical causality, but through the dynamic interplay of contradiction and synthesis. Every contradiction—whether between organism and environment, stability and change, or growth and regulation—contains within it the potential for transformation. As these contradictions unfold and are dialectically resolved, new forms of emergent coherence arise—complex properties and intelligences that cannot be predicted or reduced to the sum of individual components. In this sense, coherence is not imposed from outside but emerges immanently through the recursive interaction of forces within a layered system.
When an organic farm is allowed to regenerate in alignment with these principles, it gradually evolves from a managed environment into a self-organizing, dialectically structured ecosystem. At the heart of this transformation is the soil, which shifts from being treated as inert matter to being recognized as a living, responsive medium. In its biochemical responsiveness, the soil begins to behave with a kind of material sentience—not in a mystical sense, but in terms of its ability to metabolize nutrients, communicate with plant roots via microbial networks, and adaptively regulate its internal balances. This biochemical intelligence of the soil is made possible through the restoration of microbial communities, humus layers, and mycorrhizal networks that act as dialectical mediators between mineral substrate and living organism.
Likewise, in a regenerating organic system, pests and pathogens no longer require constant suppression, because their populations are held in check through ecological balancing. Predators, parasites, and competitors return to the system, forming complex food webs that operate as self-regulating feedback loops. Pest outbreaks, instead of being viewed as invaders from outside, are understood dialectically—as symptoms of imbalance and as opportunities for the system to adapt and recalibrate. In this way, the farm becomes a living field of ecological contradiction and self-correction, no longer requiring external chemical interventions to maintain order.
Crops, too, evolve within this dialectical context, not through genetic engineering imposed from above, but through adaptive resonance with their environment. Exposed to real-world stresses, competition, and microbial interactions, plants gradually develop resilience, deepening their biochemical strategies for survival and cooperation. This process, often dismissed by industrial agriculture as slow or inefficient, is in fact a manifestation of dialectical adaptation—an organic synthesis of heredity, environment, and relational feedback that produces robust, locally attuned varieties. Such plants are not genetically uniform but genetically rich—carrying within them a dialectic of historical memory and emergent potential.
What may appear from a conventional standpoint as “magical” or unscientific is, in the language of Quantum Dialectics, a higher-order equilibrium—a state of dynamic stability achieved not through control but through the harmonization of layered contradictions. This is not magic but material intelligence—an intelligence embedded within the very structure of matter and life, which can only be accessed through respectful engagement rather than domination. When farmers align themselves with this unfolding dialectic, they cease to function as external managers and begin to act as coherent participants in a living system of transformation, guided by observation, reflection, and response.
Thus, a regenerating organic farm becomes a microcosmic model of the dialectical universe—a space where life unfolds through contradiction, adapts through synthesis, and reveals within its emergent properties the deeper unity of matter, motion, and consciousness.
Organic farming, when understood in its full philosophical and socio-political depth, is far more than a personal lifestyle choice or a niche market category for health-conscious consumers. It is a radical mode of resistance against the dominant system of capitalist industrial agriculture, which reduces the sacred processes of life to mere commodities and transforms the creative labor of farmers into alienated, mechanized input management. In a world where agribusiness monopolies dictate seed access, chemical use, land tenure, and food distribution, organic farming stands as a form of material refusal—a conscious, grounded rejection of the logic that treats soil as dead substrate, nature as an exploitable object, and farming as a corporate operation.
At the ontological level, organic farming reclaims the dialectic of being by restoring reciprocity between humans and the living Earth. It affirms that nature is not a static background to human action, but a dynamic partner in the unfolding of existence. This relationship is not one of mastery but of mutual participation, in which the farmer does not impose order upon a chaotic world but enters into a coherent dialogue with life’s rhythms and contradictions. In doing so, organic agriculture reconfigures the human being not as a dominator of nature, but as an emergent subject within the layered, evolutionary totality of life.
Epistemologically, organic farming subverts the mechanistic worldview that underpins industrial science and capitalist exploitation. Instead of viewing agricultural systems as predictable machines reducible to inputs and outputs, it embraces a processual, relational, and emergent understanding of nature. Knowledge is no longer extracted from nature through control and measurement alone; it is generated through dialectical participation, observation, and feedback within living systems. Organic farmers develop an intuitive and experiential intelligence that cannot be captured by data alone—an embodied knowing that reflects the fluid, interpenetrating reality of ecological life.
Ethically, organic farming embodies the principle of non-dominating participation in the becoming of life. It represents a commitment to care, humility, and relational responsibility. In contrast to the extractivist logic that seeks to maximize yield regardless of environmental or human cost, organic agriculture cultivates a praxis of stewardship—a way of acting in the world that nurtures the integrity of all beings involved. This ethic is not imposed from above but emerges immanently from the lived contradictions of farming itself, requiring the constant negotiation of competing needs, seasonal constraints, and ecological limits. In this sense, the organic farm becomes a training ground for ethical subjectivity grounded in material reality.
Politically, organic farming challenges the structural violence of agribusiness monopolies, seed patent regimes, and global food imperialism. It seeks to reclaim local sovereignty over food systems, rebuild community resilience, and dismantle the dependency on corporate-controlled supply chains. By supporting local markets, cooperative models, and seed-saving initiatives, organic farmers engage in a grassroots politics of liberation—one that not only feeds people materially but also reconfigures power relations in society. Organic agriculture thus serves as a counter-hegemonic force, linking ecological regeneration with social justice and economic democracy.
In this totality, organic farming becomes far more than a method—it becomes a field of dialectical transformation, a crucible where cohesive forces of life struggle to reassert themselves against the decohesive forces of exploitation and alienation. Each act of composting, seed-saving, intercropping, or community-supported agriculture becomes a micro-revolution—an embodied affirmation of an alternative mode of life. The organic farm, then, is not just a site of food production; it is a revolutionary node within the planetary metabolism, enacting the possibility of a post-capitalist future rooted in coherence, justice, and planetary participation.
Among all elements of organic farming, soil stands out as a profound and tangible embodiment of the principles of Quantum Dialectics. It is not a passive, inert substance as mechanistic science once portrayed, but a living, dynamic quantum layer—a complex system composed of minerals, organic matter, water, air, fungi, bacteria, and a vast array of microfauna. This intricate and multi-layered structure functions as both the foundation of terrestrial life and a site of continuous dialectical processes. Soil is where death meets renewal, where decomposition feeds regeneration, and where biochemical contradiction becomes the source of biological creativity. It is, in every sense, a paradigmatic quantum dialectical medium—a field where cohesive and decohesive forces are in constant negotiation.
The subterranean interaction between plant roots and mycorrhizal fungi exemplifies this dialectical dynamic in its most elegant form. These relationships are not linear or unidirectional but based on a mutual exchange of nutrients, signals, and adaptive feedback—a biochemical conversation that resembles the phenomenon of quantum entanglement. The root and the fungal network are distinct yet non-separable; their states are internally connected across space and time. This entangled symbiosis enables plants to access nutrients far beyond their individual root zones, while fungi receive photosynthetic sugars in return. These are not merely transactions—they are processes of reciprocal becoming, where the identity and function of each participant emerges only through the relationship itself. Such interactions defy reductionist models and demand a dialectical understanding of life as a relational totality.
Compost—often treated as a technical input in conventional agriculture—takes on an entirely different meaning when seen through the lens of dialectics. It is not just organic waste; it is the materialized synthesis of death and life, the negation of decay transformed into the basis of fertility. Every handful of compost contains the molecular memory of past organisms and the biochemical potential of future growth. It enacts the dialectical law of transformation, where contradiction (the disintegration of organic matter) gives rise to a higher-order coherence (the fertility of regenerated soil). In compost, the dialectic is not metaphorical—it is physically real, embodied in the metabolic cycles of microbes, the chemical dance of nitrogen and carbon, and the microbial intelligence that orchestrates decomposition and renewal.
The health of soil, therefore, is more than a matter of agricultural productivity—it becomes a mirror of the dialectical health of civilization itself. Where soil is alive—rich in humus, teeming with microbial diversity, porous, moist, and dynamically responsive—we find systems that have maintained or restored coherence across quantum layers. These are places where human labor works with, rather than against, the dialectic of nature. Conversely, where soil is sterile, compacted, chemically saturated, and biologically dead, we witness the outward expression of social and ecological decoherence. Such degraded soil reflects a broader civilizational rupture—a symptom of systems that have prioritized extraction, speed, and control over balance, regeneration, and relational awareness.
In this sense, soil is both substrate and symbol, both a biochemical system and a historical document. It records the contradictions and resolutions of human-nature interaction over time. Regenerating the soil, therefore, is not a purely technical task—it is a revolutionary act, a material intervention in the direction of planetary coherence. It is the dialectical healing of the ground beneath our feet, and by extension, the healing of our collective future. To tend the soil organically is to participate consciously in the emergent totality of life, affirming a worldview where vitality, interconnection, and transformation replace alienation, domination, and decay.
The concept of organic certification, though initially designed to safeguard ecological integrity and consumer trust, often finds itself entangled in internal contradictions. In practice, certification can become reified—that is, reduced to a static, bureaucratic process that reproduces the very capitalist logics it seeks to counter. Large-scale producers may use certification merely as a market tool, while small farmers are burdened with complex paperwork, fees, and institutional surveillance. In such instances, the spirit of organic farming—grounded in relational ecology, ethical labor, and regenerative praxis—is hollowed out and replaced by commodified compliance. The result is a formal abstraction that risks detaching organic farming from its dialectical roots, turning a living process into a checklist.
However, from the standpoint of Quantum Dialectics, organic certification need not be rejected outright. Rather, it should be understood as a temporary stabilization—a nodal point in a larger dialectical process that seeks coherence amidst systemic incoherence. Standards, even when rigid, represent a form of collective memory and codified praxis. They embody prior struggles to define ecological responsibility, to resist chemical dependency, and to articulate the ethical foundations of food production. In this sense, certification can be seen as a sedimented form of dialectical achievement—not an end, but a provisional moment awaiting further transformation.
The contradiction arises when such sedimentation becomes ossified—when structure resists change and alienates the very communities it was meant to empower. The resolution to this lies in the negation of top-down certification models through democratic and participatory alternatives. Participatory Guarantee Systems (PGS) represent one such dialectical negation. Rooted in local knowledge, trust networks, and collective deliberation, PGS re-grounds certification in the epistemology of lived experience. Farmers and communities co-create standards, inspect one another’s practices, and engage in mutual learning. Here, the act of guaranteeing organic integrity becomes not a bureaucratic imposition, but a socially embedded praxis of coherence.
Viewed through this lens, even institutional forms, when dialectically engaged, can become vehicles of transformation rather than agents of control. They can be sublated—transcended and preserved—within a higher-order synthesis that aligns formal structure with ecological and ethical substance. The future of organic certification, therefore, is not simply a matter of reforming policy or increasing regulation. It is a question of dialectical design: How can institutions evolve in ways that enhance coherence across the molecular, ecological, social, and ethical layers of the food system? How can structure serve process, and how can law emerge from life rather than impose upon it?
In this unfolding, organic certification becomes a living dialectic—an arena where contradictions between form and content, market and meaning, control and care are actively negotiated. When aligned with participatory values and totality-conscious design, certification can become a scaffold for planetary coherence, nurturing not only organic food but organic subjectivity—where producers, consumers, and ecosystems co-create the conditions of their own flourishing.
As humanity stands on the threshold of ecological collapse and existential disorientation, the challenge before us is not merely to make farming sustainable, but to undergo a quantum dialectical revolution in our very relationship to food, labor, land, and life itself. The industrial model of agriculture—rooted in domination, commodification, and alienation—has exhausted not only soils and species, but also the ethical and cognitive ground of civilization. In its place must arise a new paradigm: not an incremental reform, but a reconfiguration of planetary metabolism guided by dialectical coherence across all layers of reality. Within this framework, organic farming is no longer just a technique; it becomes the embryo of a civilizational transformation, a living prototype of how human systems can once again resonate with the becoming of the Earth.
In this emergent paradigm, food ceases to be a mere commodity, stripped of context and sold as isolated units of caloric value. Instead, it is recognized as a co-evolved offering of Earth—a product of dialectical symbiosis between sun and soil, fungi and root, water and time. Each meal becomes a sacred transaction of material and meaning, connecting eater and ecosystem, metabolism and memory. This re-sacralization of food is not mystical but profoundly materialist—it arises from a deeper recognition of the interconnectedness of all quantum layers, from molecules to minds, from soil microbes to planetary climate systems.
Agriculture itself is redefined: no longer an act of extraction or manipulation, but one of dialectical co-creation. The farmer becomes not a controller of nature, but a mediator within it—engaging the rhythms of seasons, the intelligence of ecosystems, and the contradictions of climate and culture to co-produce nourishment. Every farm becomes a site of dialectical encounter, where human intention and natural spontaneity meet in a praxis of care, improvisation, and reflective adaptation. Techniques like polyculture, agroforestry, permaculture, and biodynamic preparation are not merely sustainable methods—they are expressions of a deeper coherence, where each organism, practice, and pattern participates in the collective unfolding of life.
At a planetary scale, farms become quantum nodes—self-organizing centers of energetic, ecological, and ethical coherence within a global field of transformation. Linked not just by trade but by shared vision, reciprocity, and totality-consciousness, they form a regenerative network—an emergent planetary agro-dialectic. Here, knowledge is not extracted and centralized, but distributed and dialectically evolved across diverse bioregions. Seeds are not patented but shared; techniques are not owned but collectively refined; food systems become expressions of solidarity, not domination.
This is not utopia in the abstract, but a material reweaving of planetary life—a revolutionary movement from the current age of disintegration and entropy toward a new era of layered coherence and dialectical vitality. It requires new institutions, new ethics, and new forms of subjectivity—rooted in humility, stewardship, and revolutionary praxis. Organic farming, in this vision, is not the end but the beginning: a living laboratory for reimagining the relationship between human civilization and the biosphere, a seedbed for a new Earth where freedom is not achieved against nature, but through the dialectical unfolding of life with it.
In this light, the future is not merely a question of how we grow food, but of how we become—as individuals, as communities, and as a planetary species awakening to its role as a conscious participant in the universal dialectic of matter, energy, and spirit.
Organic farming, when reframed through the lens of Quantum Dialectics, emerges not merely as an alternative technique of cultivation but as a profound philosophical, ecological, and political horizon of becoming. It is not limited to the avoidance of synthetic chemicals or the use of compost; rather, it embodies a living praxis of coherence—a dialectical healing process that responds to the multifaceted alienations imposed by modern industrial civilization. At its core, organic farming is an embodied response to the rupture between human praxis and planetary rhythms, between mechanistic exploitation and organic reciprocity. It is a material and spiritual synthesis—a way of reweaving the broken threads that connect soil to soul, microbes to meaning, and seeds to sovereignty.
In this expanded light, organic farming activates a dialectical integration of layers that are too often treated in isolation. At the molecular level, it honors the subtle rhythms and resonances of nutrient cycles, microbial cooperation, and mineral balance—treating the soil not as substrate but as a living quantum medium. At the ethical level, it reflects an intentionality grounded in care, responsibility, and humility—an ethics of non-domination and inter-being. At the ecological level, it recognizes the farm not as an isolated plot, but as a node in a larger web of biospheric interdependence. And at the social and political level, it becomes a practice of reclaiming autonomy from agro-industrial capital, of resisting food imperialism, and of co-constructing local economies rooted in justice, reciprocity, and resilience.
Thus, organic farming is not simply about returning to the past; it is about farming the future—about reactivating our dialectical relationship with the Earth in a way that does not dominate its processes, but coheres with its evolutionary becoming. To farm organically in this deeper sense is to enter into a new quantum-dialectical contract with the biosphere, one that acknowledges the Earth not as a resource, but as a co-evolving subjectivity. Every act of planting, every application of compost, every mutualistic interaction with insects and fungi becomes a gesture of resistance against decoherence, and a sacramental affirmation of life’s unity in diversity.
Each seed sown under this vision is not just a means to food—it is a symbolic and material act: an act of political defiance against systems of commodification and control, and a gesture toward universal coherence, where matter, energy, consciousness, and community unfold together in layered harmony. Organic farming, therefore, is both a practice and a prophecy—a grounded vision of how human beings can participate once more in the unfolding dialectic of life, not as extractors, but as co-creators in the dance of becoming.
QUANTUM DIALECTICS - BLOG ARTICLES 
Leave a comment